{"id":26730,"date":"2022-10-14T14:59:08","date_gmt":"2022-10-14T18:59:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sparketh.com\/?p=26730"},"modified":"2022-10-17T12:57:08","modified_gmt":"2022-10-17T16:57:08","slug":"did-andy-warhol-steal-this-portrait-sparketh-art-club","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sparketh.com\/did-andy-warhol-steal-this-portrait-sparketh-art-club\/","title":{"rendered":"Did Andy Warhol Steal This Portrait? – Art Club"},"content":{"rendered":"

Happy Friday artists, art lovers, and parents of creative kids and teens!\u00a0<\/strong>Welcome to Art Club:\u00a0Sparketh\u2019<\/a>s weekly round-up of the latest in art news, creative resources, trending art challenges (and more.) If you love the arts and creativity, you\u2019re in the right place!\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Today, we’re talking about a Supreme Court case battle for the rights to a famous Prince portrait (and the HUGE implications about creativity attached to the verdict). You’ll also find some new viral and trending art ideas to inspire you this week, and more!<\/p>\n

Art News: Did Andy Warhol Steal this Portrait… or Borrow Inspiration?<\/h2>\n

Where do we draw the line between inspiration and theft? And what impact will the verdict have on contemporary art and artists? These are questions being posed to the Supreme Court…a group not typically asked to solve existential debates of the art world.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

The case at hand concerns a famous portrait the iconic musical<\/em> artist, Prince, by the iconic visual<\/em> artist, Andy Warhol.<\/p>\n

Most of us know Andy Warhol (1928 – 1987) as the American artist who led the Pop Art Movement with his brightly colored, silkscreen prints of celebrities and well-known public figures. He also frequently used his art as social commentary. Prince or The Artist Formerly Known As Prince\u00a0 (1958 -2016) is known for his unique musical style which produced fifteen, No. 1 top hits worldwide.<\/p>\n

Warhol frequently used photography as the basis for his drawings, which he commonly traced with a blotted line technique (warhol.org<\/a>). He also used this technique in his famous portrait of Prince. However, celebrity photographer Lynn Goldsmith recently claimed that the work belonged more to her than it did to Andy Warhol, or to the Warhol Foundation.<\/p>\n

Why now?<\/h4>\n

The portrait is from the 1980s, so why is it current news? In 1984, Vanity Fair<\/em> paid celebrity photographer Lynn Goldsmith $400 for her portrait of Prince to be used as a one-time “artist reference” for Andy Warhol. Warhol’s work was then featured on the cover of the magazine, and the artist ultimately created 16 silkscreen portraits from the original photograph.<\/p>\n

The copyright debate, and subsequent litigation, came up much more recently. Per The New York Times<\/a>: “When Prince passed away in 2016, Vanity Fair\u2019s parent company, Cond\u00e9 Nast, published a special issue celebrating his life. It paid the foundation $10,250 to use a different image from the series for the cover. Ms. Goldsmith received no money or credit.” But more than 10 grand is at stake. According to ArtNews<\/a>, those illustrations have also been \u00a0“copyrighted by Warhol and have since been sold and reproduced for hundreds of millions of dollars.”<\/p>\n

Hundreds. Of. Millions.<\/p>\n

As of this month, the case has risen all the way up to the Supreme Court, with opinions chiming in from both sides of the debate: who owns the rights to this (now even more famous) portrait?<\/p>\n

Defining Fair Use…and Artistic Transformation.<\/h4>\n

The has sparked a lot of conversation about where we should draw the line that entitles a creative work to be permitted under “Fair Use.”<\/p>\n

“Fair Use” is a term often used in copywriting. Often in the art world (and in this case) something may be called Fair Use if it has been “transformed” to a degree where it then becomes a new work of art. According to copyright laws which have been previously established by the Supreme Court, art has been transformed if it \u201cadds something new, with a further purpose or different character, altering the first with new expression, meaning or message.\u201d<\/p>\n

So now the Court must decide not only where the money belongs, but essentially if Andy Warhol’s work is transformative or not. It’s a big question that ultimately asks about creativity and the fine-line of inspiration. Good luck, Supreme Court members.<\/p>\n

I know what I think, readers, but what do you think?\u00a0 You can check out both Prince renderings below and reach your own conclusions!\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

On the left: original photograph of Prince by Lynn Goldsmith.<\/p>\n

On the right: silkscreen rendering of Prince by Andy Warhol.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Read more about the current court case here.\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n

Viral Art: Re-imagining Childhood Art!<\/h2>\n

You know when there are no debates when it comes to Fair Use? When you are getting inspired by your own work! This week on YouTube, artist Moriah Elizabeth posted a viral video where she explores her own childhood art to get inspired as an adult. Check it out below and try it at home!<\/p>\n